After considering all the points discussed about the pre-existent world we come to the conclusion that the second and fifth interpretations are better and both of them contain very few doubts even though at times there is are contrary signs but due to the manner of arrangement and the examples these objections are not very valid. This is the reason that many commentators and orators have accepted them. There are hints about them in the traditions also and we will discuss them later.

In Short: most commentators opine that this question and answer was for all mankind in their state of existence, tacitly and not verbally or through the mental faculty that has been instilled in the human genome or through the mental capacity that was instilled into mankind after they attained maturity.

This issue speaks about the natural inclination of the heart which needs no arguments, at places it is discussed through intellect in which the realization of God has been preinstalled because the proofs about it are so clear that every human being can understand it. It is correct that some people deny it and are inclined towards materialism but if we analyze their words we will find them inclined towards intellectual realization for matter and nature. In other words they have replaced nature in place of God. This is compatible to our belief in connection with the nature of the heart. (Reflect)