3- Unanswered Questions

SiteTitle

صفحه کاربران ویژه - خروج
ورود کاربران ورود کاربران

LoginToSite

SecurityWord:

Username:

Password:

LoginComment LoginComment2 LoginComment3 .
SortBy
 
2- Extremists in Infallibly (Tanzih)4- Who are Sahaba?

Here, any wise person who do not accept reasonless expressions without thinking, ask these questions from himself:

Allah said in Qur'an about wives of Prophet (s.a.): “Wives of Prophet! Any of you who do a sin have twice the penalty, and this is easy for Allah.”1

If we interpret Sahaba in any way (which its variant interpretations will be said) wives of Prophet are their most evident examples without any doubt, and Qur'an says not only theirs sins will not be absolved but their penalty is twice the others.

Should we believe this verse or expressions of adherents of unconditioned infallibly?

And also Qur'an says about the son of Noah, Sheikh of Prophets, for his faults: “He is an unrighteous act”1 and warn Noah not to intercede about him!

Is son of Prophet more important or his friends? 

And Qur'an says about wives of Noah and Loot (two great Prophets): “Those two betrayed their husbands (Noah and Loot) (and accompany the enemies) and those two Prophets couldn’t intercede for them and it had said to them to enter the fire with infernals.”1

Do these verses say explicitly that: Scale of goodness and badness of people are their belief and acts, and even being progeny or wife of Prophet does not prevent them to be infernal if they had sins?

According to these proofs, is it correct that we close our eyes and say because that person is a friend of Prophet, friendship of him is belief and faith and disagreement with him is concision and heresy, although that person have joined hypocrites, hurt the heart of Prophet (s.a.) and betrayed Muslims afterwards?

Does sanity accept this expression?

If someone says Talha and Zubayr were good people at the beginning, but when they thought about reign and made wife of Prophet (Ayesha) their ally and broke their allegiance with Ali (a.s.) whom most of Muslims had made him their allegiant, and start the fire of Jamal war which killed about 17 thousands of Muslims, they deviate from the right way and bloods of these numerous people are on them and they should answer about all these in the judgment day, does this expression is far from truth? 

Or if someone says Muaviya who lit the fire of Saffain war and caused more than one hundred thousand of Muslims to die by refusing the allegiance of Imam (a.s.) and refusing to confess the right which was accepted to all Muslims was a Tyrant, does this person say anything wrong?!

Is it possible to deny these bitter truths in history or pass these terrible incidents by wrong justifications which no wise person accept them? Does friendship of these persons, as Abdullah Mouseli said, is belief and faith and hatred of them is concision and heresy?! Do we have a duty to keep silence about all wrong acts which have been done and caused thousands of people to die? Which sanity adjudicates like this? Qur'an says there were a group of hypocrites around Prophet (s.a.), shall we ignore these verses of Qur'an?

Holy Qur'an says: “There are some of Arabs around you hypocrites, and also some people from Medina. You don’t know them but we do.”1

Do we think that wise people of the world accept this logic?


1- Ahzab Sura, verse 30.
2- Hood Sura, verse 46.
3- Tahrim Sura, verse 10.
4- Tawba Sura, verse 101.

 

 

 

 

2- Extremists in Infallibly (Tanzih)4- Who are Sahaba?
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Lotus
Mitra
Nazanin
Titr
Tahoma